CORPORATE DEALS
HOLDING IT TOGETHER

Tougher terms and added complexity are recurring themes when buyers discuss their negotiated airline deals – and NDC is never far from the conversation

By Andy Hoskins (published 23 May 2024)

The steeply rising cost of air travel has been a cause for concern among corporates in the last two years, but even so, buyers’ negotiations with carriers are not necessarily as centred on price as they once were.

In a recent LinkedIn poll, Scott Gillespie, founder and CEO of business travel consultancy tClara, asked what corporates should prioritise in their negotiations with airlines over the next few years, having for 30 years largely focused on securing discounts and lower prices. Forty-one per cent of 100 respondents selected ‘better quality service’, 27 per cent chose lower air fares, and 23 per cent said lower carbon emissions.

The results are indicative of what Kim Hamer, partner at Results Plus Consulting, describes as a ‘recalibration’ of airline deals to focus on overall value. Airline deals are "going to be more value-based and value-driven than just hard-dollar savings, especially for those programmes that are pretty mature," says Hamer. “Just [achieving] incremental savings is going to be very difficult for very mature programmes moving forward, so you have to look at the other value drivers. How are you going to manage the traveller experience? What other value internally and externally are you giving to each other? How are you partnering together? Is this a strategic partner for you, or is this just very tactical? Those are some of the decisions that buyers are evaluating."

For three travel managers on a call convened by BTN Europe to discuss the subject, it was the implications of airlines’ NDC strategies on the construction of negotiated deals and the meeting of targets that emerged as the key talking point. All three spoke on the condition of anonymity.

NDC SPEND – IN OR OUT?

While one buyer – let’s call them Buyer A – said one of their key airline deals included discounts off NDC fares and that the purchase of NDC fares counts towards its targets with said carrier, it was by no means the norm.

"We are delivering volume to airlines whatever fare type it is. There should still be benefits to a corporate if they’re booking NDC fares. It shouldn’t just be about achieving access to them, but also some level of discount on them," they said.

The discount that Buyer A has in place with one European airline does ‘bundle’ it all together and cover NDC fares but the discount is less than might otherwise be achieved, they added. "We’re talking lower single figures rather than upper single or double figures, but ultimately we’re getting the lowest fare that exists, plus our corporate benefits," they said. However, they have had little success in negotiating similar terms with other airlines.

A second travel manager on the call, from a well-known global company, is also frustrated with those airlines choosing not to consider the corporate's NDC or direct spend. "If we had access to those NDC fares in every scenario – and that’s another conversation altogether – they should count to your overall spend target that you've set with the airline," said Buyer B. "If we're buying NDC fares we're still demonstrating loyalty to you as an airline and therefore they should be recognised as part of our spend. Right now, that's not happening in every scenario."

Before the roll-out of NDC, corporates had deals in place for certain routes where they had high volumes, with a discount across different cabins, they continued, "and then you had buckets of your spend where you were buying the non-changeable, non-refundable, non-flexible fares. They were incorporated [in progress towards targets] so why is NDC not?"

The story doesn’t end there, however, with Buyer A explaining that some airlines are struggling to track corporates’ direct or NDC spend. "The irony is they [the airlines] want [us to buy] the NDC fare because they've got a higher revenue share on that ticket, but we have no way of actually tracking that piece of business with the airline," they said. "They'll come to us and say ‘we can see that you've spent 400,000’, but we can see that we've actually spent 550,000 and that 150,000 of that is NDC [spend]."

Representing another global organisation, Buyer C agreed: "As buyers, we have omnichannel content and we are left with the challenge of consolidating it all. It shouldn't happen; it should be the airlines’ responsibility to bring it all together in one point."

Buyer B added: "Even if the airline’s intentions are good and they include NDC fares [as part of overall spend], the mechanics to track it aren’t there so we’re losing out. There's no technical capability so it becomes about the principles behind it.

"We understand why NDC is progressing, for the advancement [of the industry], and we want the airlines to make money, and we want them to build back, but the way some are going about it just isn’t working."

Perhaps inevitably, the conversation turned to American Airlines' notably aggressive NDC strategy. "Whilst I loathe the way American has dealt with it, someone had to do it [spearhead distribution evolution]. I just don't think they've managed it in the most effective way. They haven’t been prepared to invest and make it work for corporates," said Buyer B. "They don’t seem to care about corporates. They’ve been very clear – the person they're trying to talk to is the employees, not the employer. If all the airlines follow that stance, the situation's never going to be resolved."

AIRLINES’ TOUGHER TERMS

Buyer B also believes some airlines are coming down harder on corporates who are not meeting the targets agreed as part of their negotiated deal, sometimes as a result of their NDC strategies and airlines’ efforts to strengthen their financial position.

"As corporates, we work with the best of intentions of meeting the targets set out in our contracts. The challenge for the airlines is that for many, many years people had contracts in place and they weren't meeting their targets. Airlines had hundreds of thousands of deals in place with corporates that they had to monitor and track," they said.

"I think what corporate deals are going to look like going forward as a result of this is that they will be very spend and targets driven and if you're not meeting the spend thresholds for the percentage discounts that you're offered, the airlines are going to be quite bullish. They'll give you maybe one free pass, or six months or eight months depending on the relationship, and if you don't meet the targets, they will take action – which they didn't do in the past – and they will reduce your discounts."

Simply engaging with some airlines is proving difficult enough, with one industry source claiming American Airlines will only talk to those spending more than a $1 million with the airline. Moreover, those who do have corporate contracts in place with the airline often now struggle to talk to account managers after American restructured its global teams.

The upshot, said Buyer B, is that some corporates – primarily US-based companies or those in markets where there is an alternative airline to consider – have simply turned the carrier's content off in booking tools, such was the worsening complexity presented by its NDC strategy.

"American has gone hard line on this. Some airlines are taking a more softly, softly approach but I think others might go down this path too eventually," said Buyer B.

With new deals, and regardless of the airline, they had witnessed a lot more onus on buyers meeting the stipulated targets, which can make it feel like a "one-way relationship", they noted. "There’s a lot more rigidity and no flexibility or consideration for the complexity of accessing content. Airlines are saying: ‘This is your deal, take it or leave it. This is what we expect, take it or leave it.’ It's not the partnership that was there previously. But they really do want to talk to you [corporates] if you've got volume."

QUICK OUT OF THE BLOCKS

Buyer C is an enviable position, having negotiated corporate deals with its airline partners “against all recommendations” coming out of Covid. “We did a three-year deal and I’m so happy we did as we got some really significant deals,” they said.

They have since been closely monitoring average NDC fares which have proved to be higher on average than those it negotiated. “We are saving money. The NDC fares are more expensive so, based on our current agreement, there is no benefit from a financial standpoint to switch to NDC," they said. "Yes, we are moving to NDC anyway because it gives us a wider range of content, but if I look purely at commercials, there is no benefit right now."

Nevertheless, echoing Buyer B’s "one-way relationship" comment, Buyer C has pushed back on airlines’ asks of them. "They want us to push their status match [incentives], they want to be listed on a partner page on the intranet… they want all of that. We’re not charging them for that but there is value to it for them and I expect to see it reflected in our deal or we begin to push back."

While NDC has clearly put a new spin on airline negotiations, cost containment and value remain uppermost on the agenda, as Buyer B explained. "For those [corporates] who didn't travel during the pandemic, they saw huge cost savings. Imagine what large corporations saved on travel in two years – to do that without the pandemic would've taken maybe 10 years."

They continued: "Companies, CEOs, CFOs... they all took stock of this and now it's about value. They're asking: 'Who really needs to travel for business? What is the return on investment? What are we getting in return for the spend on this trip?' There's a much bigger focus on measurement and value, and that really is the way forward."